Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Latest
  • Issues
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • About
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board
    • About IIJ
  • Information for
    • Advertisers and Sponsors
    • Agents
    • Authors
    • Institutions
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Institutional Investor Journals: Home
    • The Journal of Alternative Investments
    • The Journal of Derivatives
    • The Journal of Fixed Income
    • The Journal of Index Investing
    • The Journal of Investing
    • The Journal of Portfolio Management
    • The Journal of Retirement
    • The Journal of Structured Finance
    • The Journal of Trading
    • The Journal of Wealth Management
    • Practical Applications

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Private Equity
  • Institutional Investor Journals: Home
    • The Journal of Alternative Investments
    • The Journal of Derivatives
    • The Journal of Fixed Income
    • The Journal of Index Investing
    • The Journal of Investing
    • The Journal of Portfolio Management
    • The Journal of Retirement
    • The Journal of Structured Finance
    • The Journal of Trading
    • The Journal of Wealth Management
    • Practical Applications
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
The Journal of Private Equity

The Journal of Private Equity

Advanced Search

  • Latest
  • Issues
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • About
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board
    • About IIJ
  • Information for
    • Advertisers and Sponsors
    • Agents
    • Authors
    • Institutions
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
  • Visit IIJ on Facebook
Article
Open Access

Editor’s Letter

James E. Schrager
The Journal of Private Equity Spring 2011, 14 (2) 1-2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2011.14.2.001
James E. Schrager
Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

With signs of a slow recovery starting as this issue goes to press, we present a series of articles directly related to the way we see our world, how we calculate values to guide our entries and exits, and the way others see us. Each of these lead ultimately to the way we see ourselves and the way we manage our firms.

Our lead-off article is the third in a series that examines, with the aid of hindsight, a purchase by one of the most famous investors in modern history, Warren Buffett. Joseph Calandro, Jr. analyzes a centerpiece in Buffett’s collection, GEICO insurance company. This company, now well known due to a TV saturation advertising campaign, started by insuring only workers of the government (“Government Employees Insurance Company”), of which Buffett first wrote 60 years ago. Calandro lays out the process for valuing the firm and, more importantly, develops a way to track the worth of a “franchise” firm, defined as one operating with a sustainable advantage. All areas of valuation analysis are touched upon here, including strategy, finance, and performance improvement. How good a deal did Buffett get when he bought GEICO?

Ever wonder what sophisticated advisors are telling your limited partners about how to select funds to invest in? J. Christopher Kojima and Daniel J. Murphy take us inside the mind of the investor and offer advice (from Goldman Sachs) on how to judge private equity investments. Starting with a comparison of the wide performance variance between top-tier and bottom-tier venture and buyout private equity funds versus other investment classes, the authors take potential investors through a series of non-obvious risks that the informed investor needs to consider. How many of the tough questions proposed by this article are you prepared to answer?

Now how about those funds of funds and the type of performance these entities claim for their investors? Nathalie Gresch and Rico von Wyss illuminate a large dataset of 1,641 funds, raised between 1979 and 2001, to track returns—which are risk adjusted—among various categories such as buyout, venture, real estate, mezzanine, distressed debt, and others, each of which is compared to the returns for funds of funds. Which do you think achieved the highest risk-adjusted return in this study? I was surprised. My guess is you will be as well.

How is it that we add value to our portfolio companies? This is an essential question every general partner must decide. Lucia Silva Gao considers three types of strategies for evaluation: industry specialization, industry diversification, and complementary networks. Gao uses a dataset of 132,440 financing rounds during the period of 1995 to 2004. We all know which strategy should be the best, right?

As long as we are asking basic questions, ever wonder how entrepreneurs evaluate potential VC firms? Yanfeng Zheng analyzed 4,653 online comments made about 261 venture funds looking for what entrepreneurs were particularly attentive to. He noticed that late responses and concerns with ethical behavior were of special interest as prospective entrepreneurs formed their opinions of VC firms. How do you think you would rate?

Looking at this question a different way, Dave Valliere first posits a theory of the signals venture capital partners send to entrepreneurs, and then tests that with a small sample-size study. He tests two ideas: First, that investing in early-stage deals, rather than later financings, is a signal of deal-screening ability for the VC fund. Second, that making deals with firms overlooked or rejected by other VCs is a sign of independence and special skill. The idea of course is that those VC firms that signal skill in selecting the best deals will have access to the best deal flow. While the data provide only an exploratory study, the results hint at a barrier to entry many VC firms may need to better understand.

Our final piece by Laurence M. Smith discusses one of the toughest parts of the sale of securities by a private company, the scope of indemnification that will be triggered when a breach of representations and warranties has occurred. Of course, the obvious remedy is to be reimbursed for the diminution in value caused by the breach, but there are many reasons why this will most likely result in a “call to arms” by the lawyers on both sides. Read on if you’d like to plan ahead to minimize these kinds of fireworks.

James E. Schrager

Chicago, Illinois

January 2011

  • © 2011 Pageant Media Ltd

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Private Equity: 14 (2)
The Journal of Private Equity
Vol. 14, Issue 2
Spring 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Private Equity.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s Letter
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Private Equity
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Private Equity web site.
Citation Tools
Editor’s Letter
The Journal of Private Equity Feb 2011, 14 (2) 1-2; DOI: 10.3905/jpe.2011.14.2.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Editor’s Letter
The Journal of Private Equity Feb 2011, 14 (2) 1-2; DOI: 10.3905/jpe.2011.14.2.001
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early-Stage Private Equity: Real Alpha Is Available When Done Right
  • Private-Equity-Firm-Owned Chemical Distributors: Exit through SBOs or IPOs?
  • Information Asymmetry in Emerging Markets: How Can a Government (Like India’s) Test for Tunneling in the Economy?
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Institutional Investor Journals
1120 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
  • Visit IIJ on Facebook

ABOUT US

  • Home
  • About IIJ
  • Nobel Laureates
  • Events
  • Awards
  • Careers

OUR OFFERINGS

  • Guides
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Digital Archives

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise or sponsor
  • Publish your work
  • Subscribe
  • Agents

CUSTOMER SERVICE

  • Contact Us
  • FAQ's
  • Feedback
  • Publishing Schedule 2017/2018
  • Code of Ethics
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In

© 2018 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1096-5572 | E-ISSN: 2168-8508

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies